This survey investigated prognostic factors, treatment modalities, references followed and radiation oncologists’ opinions to prescribe adjuvant therapy in early intermediate-risk cervical cancer. All but one recommended pelvic radiotherapy ± vaginal boost (45%) with or without chemotherapy (20%). 88% believed other prognostic factors could integrate classic risk criteria. 66% considered chemo-radiation indicated in case of lymphovascular invasion and suboptimal node dissection, high grade, size ≥ 4 cm, non squamous histology and risk factors combination. This wide heterogeneity of treatments reflects the different guideline options due to the lack of defined indications. The need of integrating the classic prognostic factors with others factors was unanimously expressed by radiation oncologists. The best local and systemic therapy should be established through new studies. These results highlighted the need of a position paper to standardize adjuvant treatment in Italy and to design collaborative studies to clarify the controversial aspects.

Postoperative treatment of intermediate-risk early stage cervical cancer. results of a survey from the Gynecology Study Group in the AIRO Gyn and MITO Groups / Elisabetta Perrucci, A; Annamaria Cerrotta, B; Gabriella Macchia, C; Antonietta Augurio, D; Maura Campitelli, E; DE SANCTIS, Vitaliana; Roberta Lazzari, G; Elena Magri, H; Anna Rita Marsella, I; Sofia Meregalli, J; Marinella Tamburo, K; Gabriella Ferrandina, L; Cynthia, Aristei. - In: CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1040-8428. - 174:(2022), pp. 1-7. [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103704]

Postoperative treatment of intermediate-risk early stage cervical cancer. results of a survey from the Gynecology Study Group in the AIRO Gyn and MITO Groups

Vitaliana De Sanctis f;
2022

Abstract

This survey investigated prognostic factors, treatment modalities, references followed and radiation oncologists’ opinions to prescribe adjuvant therapy in early intermediate-risk cervical cancer. All but one recommended pelvic radiotherapy ± vaginal boost (45%) with or without chemotherapy (20%). 88% believed other prognostic factors could integrate classic risk criteria. 66% considered chemo-radiation indicated in case of lymphovascular invasion and suboptimal node dissection, high grade, size ≥ 4 cm, non squamous histology and risk factors combination. This wide heterogeneity of treatments reflects the different guideline options due to the lack of defined indications. The need of integrating the classic prognostic factors with others factors was unanimously expressed by radiation oncologists. The best local and systemic therapy should be established through new studies. These results highlighted the need of a position paper to standardize adjuvant treatment in Italy and to design collaborative studies to clarify the controversial aspects.
2022
cervical cancer; intermediate-risk early stage; risk factors; adjuvant treatment ; radiotherapy, chemoradiation; survey
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Postoperative treatment of intermediate-risk early stage cervical cancer. results of a survey from the Gynecology Study Group in the AIRO Gyn and MITO Groups / Elisabetta Perrucci, A; Annamaria Cerrotta, B; Gabriella Macchia, C; Antonietta Augurio, D; Maura Campitelli, E; DE SANCTIS, Vitaliana; Roberta Lazzari, G; Elena Magri, H; Anna Rita Marsella, I; Sofia Meregalli, J; Marinella Tamburo, K; Gabriella Ferrandina, L; Cynthia, Aristei. - In: CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1040-8428. - 174:(2022), pp. 1-7. [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103704]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Perrucci_Postoperative-treatment-cervicalcancer_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 479.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
479.63 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1632277
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact